Back to blog
Why Fast Sites Rank Better on Google: The Link Between Speed and SEO

Why Fast Sites Rank Better on Google: The Link Between Speed and SEO

Discover why Google favors fast sites in search results. Understand the link between web performance and SEO, and learn how to optimize your site to improve your ranking.

15.12.2025
11 min read
Share this article:
seo
performance
google
referencement
core web vitals
ranking
optimisation

Why Google favors fast sites

Since 2010, Google has been using page load speed as a ranking factor in search results. This decision is not arbitrary: it's based on simple but powerful logic: fast sites provide a better user experience, and Google rewards this quality. In 2025, with the introduction of Core Web Vitals as official ranking factors and the continued strengthening of performance importance in algorithms, this relationship between performance and SEO is more important than ever. Understanding this link is essential for any website owner who wants to improve their online visibility and organic traffic.

Improved ranking in Google search results by up to 15 positions
30-50% reduction in bounce rate thanks to faster pages
Up to 40% increase in organic traffic according to studies
Better user experience, especially on mobile (60%+ of searches)
Eligibility for advanced search features (Featured Snippets, Rich Results)
Reduced infrastructure and bandwidth costs

Common mistakes that harm your SEO

The evolution of performance as an SEO factor

2010: Google's first announcement

In April 2010, Google officially announced that page load speed would become a ranking factor for desktop searches. This announcement marked a turning point in SEO history, as it was the first time a purely performance-related technical factor became a ranking criterion. At the time, this decision was controversial: some webmasters believed that content should be the only ranking factor. But Google had already understood that user experience was inseparable from content quality.

Timeline showing the evolution of performance as an SEO factor at Google
April 2010: Official announcement of speed as a ranking factor for desktop
2015: Strengthening of mobile speed importance
2018: Extension to mobile searches with mobile-first indexing
May 2021: Introduction of Core Web Vitals as official ranking factors
2024: Replacement of FID with INP (Interaction to Next Paint)
September 2025: Strengthening of speed weight in the algorithm
2021: The Core Web Vitals era

In May 2021, Google introduced Core Web Vitals as official ranking factors. These three metrics (LCP, FID replaced by INP in 2024, and CLS) measure real user experience rather than just raw speed. This evolution represents a fundamental change: Google no longer just measures whether a page loads fast, but evaluates how users actually perceive this speed.

Sites with 'Good' scores on all three Core Web Vitals are 24% more likely to rank in top positions according to 2025 studies
Sites with a CLS above 0.25 have experienced significant ranking volatility, while those with an LCP under 2.5 seconds have maintained position stability
2024-2025: Continued strengthening

In September 2025, Google announced a strengthening of page load speed weight in its algorithm. This update confirms that performance is not a passing trend, but a fundamental pillar of modern SEO. Sites that neglect performance risk seeing their ranking degrade progressively.

Recent changes

Replacement of FID with INP in 2024 to better measure interactivity
Increase in speed weight in the algorithm in September 2025
Strengthening of Core Web Vitals importance for mobile ranking
Greater integration of real user data (Chrome User Experience Report)

Why Google favors fast sites

User experience first

Google has a clear mission: to provide the best possible search results to its users. Fast sites offer a better user experience, which translates into positive behavioral metrics that Google uses as quality signals. Here's why speed directly impacts user experience:

Chart showing the correlation between load speed and user satisfaction
Reduced bounce rate: Users leave fast sites less quickly. A study shows that 53% of mobile users abandon a site that takes more than 3 seconds to load
Longer session time: Visitors stay longer on performing sites, exploring more pages and consuming more content
Higher conversion rate: Fast sites convert better, especially in e-commerce. Amazon calculated that a one-second delay costs $1.6 billion per year in lost sales
Increased user satisfaction: A smooth experience creates a positive impression and encourages users to return
Increased social shares: Users share sites that work well more easily

Bounce rate

Pages that load in less than 2 seconds have an average bounce rate of 9%, compared to 38% for those that take 5 seconds or more

Conversion

Each second of load delay can reduce conversions by 7%. For an e-commerce site generating €100,000 in sales per day, a one-second improvement can represent €7,000 in additional daily sales

Mobile

53% of mobile users abandon a site that takes more than 3 seconds to load

Revenue

Walmart found that a 1-second improvement in load time increased conversions by 2% and revenue by 1%

Costs for Google

Slow sites also cost Google more in terms of server resources and bandwidth. When a user clicks on a search result and the site is slow, they may quickly return to Google to try another result. This 'quick return' (pogo-sticking) phenomenon increases the load on Google's servers and degrades the overall user experience.

Additional server resource consumption to process new queries
Increased bandwidth needed
Degradation of Google's overall user experience
Risk that the user loses trust in Google search results
Mobile-first approach

With over 60% of searches performed on mobile in 2025, Google has adopted a mobile-first approach. Since mobile connections are generally slower and less stable than fixed connections (4G, 5G vs fiber), performance becomes even more critical on mobile. Google now measures Core Web Vitals primarily on mobile, and these metrics directly influence desktop ranking as well.

Core Web Vitals are measured primarily on mobile since 2021
Mobile-optimized sites achieve better rankings, even for desktop searches
Mobile performance directly influences desktop ranking
Google uses mobile data to evaluate all sites, confirming the importance of mobile-first
Since mobile connections are slower, each performance optimization has an even more significant impact
Competition with other search engines

Google is not the only search engine to prioritize performance. Bing, DuckDuckGo and other engines also use speed as a ranking factor. By favoring fast sites, Google ensures it remains competitive and provides the best possible experience to its users.

The impact of Core Web Vitals on SEO

The three key metrics explained in detail

Core Web Vitals measure three essential aspects of user experience. Understanding how Google uses them for ranking is crucial for optimizing your SEO:

Visualization of the three Core Web Vitals: LCP, INP and CLS

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

LCP measures the time needed for the largest visible element of your page (image, video, text block or main content element) to be loaded and rendered. Google considers an optimal LCP if it's under 2.5 seconds. Between 2.5 and 4 seconds, it's acceptable but perfectible. Beyond 4 seconds, it's considered poor.

Sites with good LCP are 34% more likely to rank in the top 10 according to studies. A poor LCP can reduce your organic traffic by 20-30%

Factors:

•Server response time (Time to First Byte)
•Critical resource load time (CSS, JavaScript)
•Client-side rendering time
•Size and optimization of main images

INP (Interaction to Next Paint)

INP measures your site's responsiveness by evaluating the delay between a user interaction (click, tap, keyboard press) and when the browser visually displays the response. An optimal INP is under 200 milliseconds. INP replaced FID in 2024 because it better measures real interactivity, not just the first interaction.

A poor INP can significantly reduce time spent on site, which is a negative signal for Google. Sites with an INP under 200ms see their bounce rate reduced by 15-25%

Factors:

•JavaScript execution time
•Code parsing and compilation time
•Main thread blocking
•Interaction complexity

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

CLS measures the visual stability of your page by detecting element shifts during loading. Each shift is measured and cumulated to give a final score. An optimal CLS is under 0.1. Between 0.1 and 0.25, it's acceptable. Beyond 0.25, it's considered poor.

Visual shifts frustrate users and increase bounce rate. Sites with a CLS above 0.25 have experienced significant ranking volatility according to 2025 studies

Factors:

•Images without defined dimensions
•Web fonts that load asynchronously
•Ads and iframes that load dynamically
•Dynamically injected content without reserving space
Real studies and statistics: measurable impact

Several recent studies confirm the direct impact of performance on SEO. Here are concrete data that demonstrate why investing in performance is profitable:

SQ Magazine, 2025

Sites with 'Good' scores on all three Core Web Vitals are 34% more likely to rank in the top 10 of Google results. This study analyzed over 1 million web pages.

The study also revealed that sites with a single poor Core Web Vital saw their organic traffic reduced by 15-20%, while those with all three poor metrics lost up to 40% of their traffic.

Sellthru.me, 2025

Pages that load in less than 2 seconds have an average bounce rate of 9%, compared to 38% for those that take 5 seconds or more. This 29 percentage point difference has a direct impact on Google ranking.

The study also showed that each additional second of loading increased bounce rate by 7-8 percentage points on average.

Google Search Central, 2025

Load speed has been a confirmed ranking factor since 2010, with continued strengthening of its importance. In September 2025, Google even increased the weight of speed in the algorithm.

Google now explicitly recommends optimizing Core Web Vitals to improve SEO, confirming that these metrics are directly linked to ranking.

Waterfaller.dev, 2025

Sites with an LCP under 2.5 seconds maintained ranking stability, while those with a CLS above 0.25 experienced significant volatility after algorithm updates.

This volatility can cause loss of several positions in search results, directly impacting organic traffic.

Before optimization

LCP:4.5s
INP:350ms
CLS:0.22
Google Position:Position 15-20
Organic Traffic:1000 visits/month
Bounce Rate:65%
Conversion Rate:1.8%
Revenue:$1800/month

After optimization

LCP:2.1s
INP:120ms
CLS:0.05
Google Position:Position 3-5
Organic Traffic:2800 visits/month
Bounce Rate:32%
Conversion Rate:3.2%
Revenue:$4480/month

Improvements

LCP improved by 53% (from 4.5s to 2.1s) - transition from 'Poor' to 'Good'
INP reduced by 66% (from 350ms to 120ms) - transition from 'Poor' to 'Good'
CLS divided by 4 (from 0.22 to 0.05) - transition from 'Needs Improvement' to 'Good'
Organic traffic multiplied by 2.8 (from 1000 to 2800 visits/month)
Average position improved by 15 positions (from position 17 to position 4)
Bounce rate reduced by 51% (from 65% to 32%)
Conversion rate improved by 78% (from 1.8% to 3.2%)
Revenue multiplied by 2.5 (from $1800 to $4480/month)

Performance impact by sector

E-commerce: where every second counts

In the e-commerce sector, performance has a direct and measurable impact on revenue. Studies show that:

Chart showing the impact of performance on e-commerce conversions
Amazon calculated that a one-second delay costs $1.6 billion per year in lost sales
Walmart found that a 1-second improvement increased conversions by 2% and revenue by 1%
For an e-commerce site generating €100,000 in sales per day, a one-second improvement can represent €7,000 in additional daily sales
Fast e-commerce sites see their cart abandonment rate reduced by 20-30%

French e-commerce site (anonymized)

Before

Load time:4.2s
Conversion rate:2.1%
Revenue:€42,000/month

After

Load time:1.8s
Conversion rate:3.7%
Revenue:€74,000/month
Media and content: engagement and shares

For media and content sites, performance directly impacts engagement and social shares:

Articles that load quickly are shared 2.5 times more on social networks
Session time increases by 30-40% on fast sites
Fast media sites see their bounce rate reduced by 25-35%
Engagement (comments, likes) increases by 20-30% on performing sites
SaaS and web applications: crucial first impression

For SaaS applications, performance on first visit is crucial for converting visitors into users:

Fast SaaS sites convert 40% more visitors into trial users
Homepage load time directly influences signup rate
A 1-second improvement can increase conversions by 15-20%
Users perceive fast sites as more professional and reliable

Indirect performance signals

Bounce rate and time on site

Performance indirectly influences SEO through user behavioral signals. Google uses these metrics as indicators of content quality and user experience:

Chart showing the correlation between speed and bounce rate
Reduced bounce rate: Fast sites keep visitors longer. A high bounce rate indicates to Google that content is not relevant or user experience is poor
Increased session time: More time spent on site = positive signal for Google. Performing sites see their average session time increase by 30-50%
Pages per session: Fast sites encourage navigation. Users visit on average 2-3 more pages on fast sites
Conversion rate: Performing sites convert better, which is a quality signal for Google. A site that converts well indicates that content is relevant and user experience is good
Social shares and backlinks

Fast sites naturally generate more engagement, which translates into more social shares and natural backlinks:

Users share sites that work well more easily. A study shows that articles that load quickly are shared 2.5 times more on social networks
Performing sites receive more natural backlinks. Bloggers and media prefer to reference fast and reliable sites
Social engagement is a quality signal for Google. Social shares can indirectly influence ranking
Media and influencers prefer to reference fast sites. A slow site can discourage references, even if content is excellent
Return rate and retention

Fast sites create a better first impression, which encourages users to return:

Users return more often to fast sites
Return rate increases by 20-30% on performing sites
Retention is better, which can influence ranking in the long term
Fast sites generate more bookmarks and direct visits

Common mistakes that harm your SEO

Neglecting mobile performance

One of the most common mistakes is optimizing only for desktop. With 60%+ of searches on mobile, neglecting mobile performance is a critical error:

Mobile vs desktop performance comparison
Testing only on desktop and ignoring mobile performance
Not optimizing images for mobile (too heavy, wrong format)
Loading all scripts even on mobile, without code splitting
Ignoring mobile Core Web Vitals in Google Search Console
Optimizing only the homepage

Many sites optimize only their homepage, neglecting internal pages that often generate more organic traffic:

Optimizing only the homepage
Neglecting category and product pages (e-commerce)
Ignoring blog and article pages
Not optimizing landing pages
Over-optimization and technical errors

Some poorly done optimizations can harm performance and SEO:

Too aggressive minification that breaks code
Poorly configured compression that increases server processing time
Poorly configured caching that serves outdated content
Image optimization that degrades visual quality too much

How to optimize your site to improve your SEO

Essential technical optimizations

Here are the main optimizations to implement to improve your performance and SEO. These optimizations have a direct and measurable impact on your Core Web Vitals and Google ranking:

Code minification

Reducing the size of your JavaScript, CSS and HTML files can improve load time by 40 to 80%. Minification removes spaces, comments and unnecessary characters without changing code functionality.

Average 60% reduction in JS/CSS file size, 200-500ms LCP improvement, 50-100ms INP improvement thanks to faster parsing
Use tools like FastMinify to minify your code quickly and efficiently. FastMinify processes your code client-side, ensuring your source code confidentiality.

Server compression

Enable GZIP or Brotli compression on your server to reduce the size of transferred files. Compression can reduce text file size by 70 to 90%.

70 to 90% reduction in text file size (HTML, CSS, JS). Brotli offers 15-20% better compression than GZIP. Combined with minification, you can reduce total size by 85-95%.
Configure mod_deflate (Apache) or gzip (Nginx) on your server. For Brotli, install mod_brotli (Apache) or ngx_brotli (Nginx).

Image optimization

Compress and properly format your images (WebP, AVIF) to reduce their weight. Images often represent 50-70% of a page's total weight.

50 to 80% reduction in image size without visible quality loss. WebP format offers 25-35% better compression than JPEG. AVIF offers another 20-30% better than WebP.
Use tools like ImageOptim, Squoosh, or WordPress plugins like Smush or ShortPixel. For developers, use command-line tools like sharp or imagemin.

Caching

Configure browser and server caching to reduce repeated requests. Caching can drastically reduce load time for returning visitors.

Drastic reduction in load time for returning visitors (from several seconds to a few milliseconds). Reduced server load and bandwidth costs.
Configure Cache-Control headers and use a CDN like Cloudflare, CloudFront or Fastly. For WordPress, use plugins like W3 Total Cache or WP Rocket.

Code splitting and lazy loading

Load only the code needed for the visible page and defer loading the rest. This reduces initial load time.

30 to 50% reduction in initial load time. 40-60% reduction in initial JavaScript bundle size. LCP and INP improvement.
Use native lazy loading for images (loading='lazy' attribute) and code splitting for JavaScript (Webpack, Vite, or frameworks like Next.js, Nuxt.js).

Web font optimization

Web fonts can slow down loading and cause layout shifts. Optimize them to improve performance.

50-70% reduction in font load time. CLS reduction by avoiding FOIT (Flash of Invisible Text) and FOUT (Flash of Unstyled Text).
Use font-display: swap, preload critical fonts, and use font subsets to reduce their size.
Optimization priorities: where to start?

Start with optimizations that have the most impact on your Core Web Vitals and SEO. Here's a prioritized action plan:

Pyramid of optimization priorities to improve SEO

Priority 1: Maximum impact (do first)

These optimizations have the greatest impact on your Core Web Vitals and SEO. Do them first:

Minify and compress your JavaScript and CSS files (improves LCP and INP)
Enable server compression GZIP/Brotli (reduces size by 70-90%)
Optimize main images (WebP format, compression, dimensions) - improves LCP and CLS
Configure basic caching (improves LCP for returning visitors)
Time investment: 2-4 hours
Expected impact: 30-50% LCP improvement, 20-30% INP improvement, 40-60% CLS improvement

Priority 2: Significant impact (do next)

These optimizations have a significant impact and are relatively easy to implement:

Implement lazy loading for non-critical images (improves LCP)
Reduce number of HTTP requests (combine files, use sprites)
Use a CDN to serve static resources (improves LCP)
Optimize web fonts (subset, preload, font-display) - improves CLS
Time investment: 4-8 hours
Expected impact: Additional 15-25% LCP improvement, 20-30% CLS improvement

Priority 3: Advanced optimizations (to go further)

These optimizations require more time and expertise but can bring additional gains:

Advanced code splitting and tree shaking (reduces initial bundle size)
Service Workers for offline caching (improves performance for returning visitors)
HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 (improves parallel resource loading)
Database query optimization (for dynamic sites)
Critical resource preloading (preload, prefetch)
Time investment: 8-16 hours
Expected impact: Additional 10-20% improvement on all Core Web Vitals

Measuring the impact of your optimizations

Essential measurement tools

To track the impact of your optimizations on SEO, use these free and paid tools. Each tool brings a different perspective:

Dashboard showing performance and SEO metrics

Google Search Console

Google's free tool to monitor your presence in search results. Essential for tracking the SEO impact of your optimizations.

Metrics: Average position, impressions, clicks, Core Web Vitals, click-through rate (CTR), indexed pages

Usage: Regularly check (weekly) your average position, impressions and clicks. Monitor the Core Web Vitals section to see the evolution of your metrics.

PageSpeed Insights

Google's free tool that analyzes your page performance and provides detailed recommendations. Uses real Chrome user data.

Metrics: Performance score (0-100), Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS), optimization opportunities, diagnostics

Usage: Test your main pages (homepage, category pages, popular articles) before and after optimization. Aim for a score of 90+.

Google Analytics

Google's free tool to track user behavior and measure impact on conversions.

Metrics: Bounce rate, session time, pages per session, conversion rate, revenue generated

Usage: Create segments to compare performance before/after optimization. Monitor the evolution of bounce rate and session time.

Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX)

Access real performance data for your site based on real Chrome users. Available in Google Search Console and via the public API.

Metrics: Aggregated Core Web Vitals data based on real users, breakdown by connection type (4G, 5G, etc.)

Usage: Consult CrUX data in Google Search Console to see how real users perceive your site.

Lighthouse (Chrome DevTools)

Tool integrated into Chrome DevTools to audit performance, accessibility, SEO and best practices.

Metrics: Performance score, Core Web Vitals, optimization opportunities, detailed audits

Usage: Use Lighthouse in incognito mode to avoid extensions that can skew results. Regularly test your main pages.

WebPageTest

Free and open-source tool to test your page performance from different locations and connections.

Metrics: Detailed load time, waterfall chart, Core Web Vitals, recommendations

Usage: Test from different locations (USA, Europe, Asia) and connection types (3G, 4G, fiber) to see the impact on different users.

Metrics to track to measure success

Monitor these key indicators to measure the impact of your optimizations on SEO and performance:

Metrics to track

Average position in Google Search Console (goal: 5-10 position improvement)
Number of organic impressions and clicks (goal: 20-40% increase)
Core Web Vitals scores (LCP, INP, CLS) - goal: all in 'Good'
Bounce rate (goal: 20-30% reduction)
Session time (goal: 30-50% increase)
Pages per session (goal: 20-30% increase)
Conversion rate (goal: 15-25% improvement)
Revenue generated (goal: proportional increase to traffic)
Average page load time (goal: 40-60% reduction)
PageSpeed Insights score (goal: 90+ on mobile and desktop)
How to interpret results

Understanding how to interpret your optimization results is crucial for adjusting your strategy:

How to interpret results

Average position

A 5-10 position improvement can take 2-4 weeks after optimization. Significant improvements (15+ positions) can take 2-3 months.

Core Web Vitals

Core Web Vitals are updated daily in Google Search Console, but changes can take a few days to appear.

Organic traffic

Organic traffic increase generally follows position improvement with a 2-4 week delay.

Minification Tools

Try our free minification tools to optimize your code:

JavaScript Minifier

Minify, unminify and beautify your JavaScript code instantly.

CSS Minifier

Optimize your CSS stylesheets for better performance.

JSON Formatter

Format, minify and beautify your JSON files easily.

SVG Minifier

Reduce your SVG file sizes for faster loading.

Conclusion: Performance, a profitable investment for your SEO

The relationship between web performance and SEO is no longer in doubt. Google clearly favors fast sites, and this trend is only intensifying with the introduction of Core Web Vitals and the continued strengthening of performance importance in algorithms. Investing in optimizing your site's performance is not just a technical matter: it's a strategic investment that can significantly improve your online visibility, organic traffic and conversions. Studies show that performing sites see their organic traffic increase by 25-40% on average, with ranking improvements of 5-15 positions. For an e-commerce site, this can represent tens of thousands of euros in additional monthly revenue. Performance optimization is no longer an option, it's a necessity to succeed online in 2025.

Start with high-impact optimizations: minification, compression, image optimization. These three optimizations can improve your Core Web Vitals by 40-60% in a few hours.
Regularly measure your Core Web Vitals with PageSpeed Insights and monitor their evolution in Google Search Console. Metrics don't lie.
Monitor your position in Google Search Console and correlate improvements with your optimizations to validate their effectiveness.
Test your optimizations on mobile, where performance is even more critical. 60%+ of searches are performed on mobile.
Document your improvements (before/after) to track impact on SEO and justify future investments.
Stay up to date with the latest Google algorithm developments. Performance continues to evolve as a ranking factor.
Don't neglect internal pages. Optimize all your important pages, not just the homepage.
Integrate performance optimization into your development workflow. Performance must be an ongoing concern, not a one-time project.
Share this article
Share this article:

Related Articles

Online Minifiers vs Build Tools (Webpack, Vite, Terser): When to Use Each
Online Minifiers vs Build Tools (Webpack, Vite, Terser): When to Use Each

Understand the differences between online minifiers and build tools. Learn when to use each approach to optimize your development workflow.

10.01.20269 min read
How to Unminify JavaScript for Debugging (Readable Output)
How to Unminify JavaScript for Debugging (Readable Output)

Learn how to unminify minified JavaScript for debugging. Transform unreadable code into formatted, understandable code in just a few clicks with our free tool.

22.12.20257 min read
GZIP and Brotli Compression: Complete Guide for Apache and Nginx — Reduce Your File Size by 70-90%
GZIP and Brotli Compression: Complete Guide for Apache and Nginx — Reduce Your File Size by 70-90%

Learn how to enable GZIP and Brotli compression on your Apache and Nginx servers. Step-by-step tutorial for all levels, with ready-to-use configurations and verification tools.

28.11.202512 min read
Why Fast Sites Rank Better on Google: The Link Between Speed and SEO